Thursday, September 23, 2010

Knights in White Satin

"Knights in White Satin," now there is an unusual visual. The knight whom we normally see as garbed in his suit of mail, armored and hard, dressed in here in flowing white, soft and unprotected. This dichotomy seems to ring true in modern life. I spent the evening talking to someone. They in their own way saw the world as full of knights and damsels in distress. And it bothered them greatly that the damsels so often resisted being saved.

We talked quite a long while. We talked about how the world has evolved. How perhaps what people, (women) are seeking is comfort, not saving. Women have learned over the years to take care of so much of life for themselves. The illusion of the knight has long since past. While they still look at men as strong and vibrant, they simply do not see them as the all necessary cave-man protector anymore. My friend, in his turn, just did not buy that. He really believed that every woman wants to be totally and completely sheltered, cared-for, protected, and indeed directed. And I found this odd, as his mother raised him on his own, and is a self-started career business woman and has always cared for her family without help.

I would be the very first to say that I know of no person who does not want to have the shelter of someone's love to embrace them. I can't think of anyone that does not desire a relationship where they know that person's strength is there to support them when they need it most. But I can say I am pretty sure I don't know of all that many people who want to be totally and completely dominated so that they can be unburdened of the process of dealing with daily life. But perhaps I just hang around in unusual circles.

I have noticed that I have a few friends lately that seem to be changing as rapidly as the leaves are changing colors. Where once they were very internal with private things and gregarious only with external humor - now I hardly recognize them. They have springboarded into putting almost every element of their lives on public display - almost as if the more people who look at what they are doing will somehow make it more real - more valuable. Or perhaps they are stretching to be validated, and this public offering of themselves is their way achieving such validation. On the other hand, some incredibly open people I have known seem to be retracting and pulling back. They have become rather introspective, having reached a time where putting everything out there has lost its luster. And they seem to be gathering nuts for winter, hoarding them away so they will not be hungry later.

My friend and I talked about this changing and pondered if it was the autumnal equinox, the impact of a cultural shift, or if perhaps we just knew people who spanned so many age groups that it was difficult to get a feel for how the world worked anymore. And I think we decided it was the latter. Consistency among our population's mores and value systems is fairly non-existent. And for those of us who dabble in social media, we seem to touch a broader spectrum and perhaps feel more of the disruption of the cultural rhythms.

I like to think that the more we share our views and see the shifting tides, the more likely it is that we will come to understand how it is that our knights can become comfortable in white satin and we can be comfortable seeing them that way too. Its a thought and perhaps a wish too .........

3 comments:

  1. "Knights in White Satin," is an interesting backdrop to what you are talking about and pondering as the song goes on to say, "never reaching the end..." Sometimes I feel like I am so full of cliches that I have to fight to find an original thought, however this phrase does seem appropriate here, "The only constant is change."

    I am sure your friend could find a damsel who wants to be saved and and protected and "taken care of." I would strongly urge him to ask himself if that is what he truly wants. Rescuing a damsel from one tower only to lock her up in another while you fight to protect her honor? Well, that doesn't sound as much like love to me as control. In which case you might want to be careful your Guinevere doesn't start looking for kid Lancelot. If I were in a committed and loving relationship I would much prefer that it be one of equals who each protect and look out for the other. What is love but putting your lover's needs and desires above your own and all others? If you are both doing that it sounds like a pretty good recipe. But hey, not an expert here, only conjecturing as I haven't successfully cooked that souffle' myself. But walking around in a suit of armor all the time is pretty restrictive, not to mention hot. Cool white satin? I'm all for that.

    As I have gotten older I am feeling a certain level of.... gee dare I say it... maturity that I didn't have before. (okay, go ahead and laugh) So where I have always been a very private person in the past I am now seeing myself open up about the personal more. Just a bit. Now I am willing to admit the immaturity of myself in past relationships, and willing to publicly question whether I would even be capable of the kind of love I just described.

    Take a look at what passes for culture in this country, look hard if you can find it, and I think there you will find a real disconnect in what you term our mores and value systems. I often feel it is better not to listen to the distraction. It can drown out the voice of our own hearts that we should be listening to.

    That song is a love song, I think of unrequited love. "Letters I've written, never meaning to send..." is how it goes on. And about the beauty he's always missed seeing before. Live in the real world but allow yourself to dream. Find the love an equal and share. Sounds good. To paraphrase Graham Edge's lovely poem that is wrapped up in the heart of "Knights in White Satin," "... yet we decide which is real and which is an illusion." Now, wrapping myself up nights in white satin sheets with a real lover - that is something that can make me daydream at night!

    ReplyDelete
  2. RJ

    All very true. Though I would lean toward opening up the personal on a private level - meaning one on one - rather than putting my intimacies out for full public display, which was what I was referring to. It seems that there are those who reach a point in life where the one on one is no longer enough to assure them that the life they are living is real - thus a need to have a more public viewing and validation to make the life become real. Almost as if living it large enough will make whatever it is they are trying to be or to feel will become true if enough people live it with them. In any event, when we decide on our own, as individuals what is real and what is an illusion, we know what is the foundation of our reality and we base our faith in that. When we require others to shore up this decision - we base it on shifting sand - as soon as the others choose to perceive it differently our reality is indeed on shaky ground. I think I prefer my castles to be of my own making - be they as simple as a cottage in the wood or as elaborate as Ashford Castle in Cong. Either way, I know they are real enough for me.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh gosh yes, keep the personal intimacies private. For all our sakes. Gotcha. Between two there can be a whole world without ever leaving the room, or the castle. And best to stay in that room and see what plays out when you can. Thanks for this forum btw.

    ReplyDelete